Commentaries
My number one piece of advice to people studying academic theology at doctrinally mixed or liberal universities is to read good evangelical commentaries on the relevant passages. I find here a good place for recommending evangelical commentaries on books, though I disagree with some of their selections.
A while ago, I was asked about the NIV Application Commentaries series. I've recently had occasion to skim quite a lot of commentaries, and I can make the following points:
- They're probably more consistently solid as a series than Tyndale (or even BST). Some of that is down to the format. On the other hand, I don't think there's anything spectacularly amazing in the series - I think that's also down to the format.
- They're not heavyweight in terms of textual stuff, translation issues, etc but they do mention them. A few of them are shortened versions of other stuff in print (e.g. Smith's very good commentary on Amos).
- They're ok at applications (better than Tyndale / BST) - they probably make it a lot easier to preach a decent sermon on a passage, but not much easier to do an excellent one
2 Comments:
What do you think of Tom Wright's "X for Everyone" series? I haven't looked at them but have heard a number of reccomendations, and am about to borrow the Mark one off a friend. Your thoughts?
I like a lot of Tom Wright's stuff, but I've never really managed to get into the "for everyone series", though I know lots of people who find them useful.
My instinctive reaction is that NTW is excellent as a theologian - at putting together what the Bible says about issues - but less good at dealing with the detail of the passage. And I sometimes feel as if "for everyone" excludes me...
But if you find them a good way to understand the text of the Bible, then that's great. :o)
Post a Comment
<< Home